Current Events vs. Founding Documents

Entry 28                  Submitted by: Mark Musselman

Current Event

Per the Washington Post Friday, January 29, 2010; (full article available on-line)

Obama was near the end of his speech when he turned his attention to the court’s decision last week in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The ruling overturned two precedents and left corporations free to use their profits to support or oppose political candidates.

“With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that, I believe, will open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections,” Obama said.

“I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests or, worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people. And I urge Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps correct some of these problems.”

…………

“Not true, not true,” he appeared to say (other lip readers think he said, “That’s not true”) as he shook his head and furrowed his brow. It is unclear what part of Obama’s statement he was objecting to, although he started shaking his head after the president said “special interests.”
…………

Alito was an accomplished jurist, Obama said at the time, “but when you look at his record — when it comes to his understanding of the Constitution, I have found that in almost every case, he consistently sides on behalf of the powerful against the powerless; on behalf of a strong government or corporation against upholding American’s individual rights.”

VS

Obama verses the Constitution

Founding Document

The US Constitution: First Amendment

We the People:

The issue is whether Congress exceeded its constitutional authority to limit the funding of speech, not the size or status of the litigants. Sadly, this point seems to be lost on our president.